I have been posting a lot about conditional text. Work. FrameMaker. Bah!
Just read a Quantum Computing paper.
Conditional text and quantum seem related: both involve superposition, having a single value represent multiple. If I advocate conditional text, should I also advocate quantum?
Here's a thought: why is quantum computing more efficient? If the answer is superposition, the increased efficiency may lie in the fact that a single operation involving two values, one with M superpositioned values, and the other with N, usually corresponds to M*N non-superpositioned values.
In I-stages
val.stage_i.j := val.stage[i-1].jj OP val.stage[i-1].kk
If 2-way superimposed by stage 0, doubles every stage => stage 1:2*2=4, stage:4*4=16, and so on.
Not just 2^N but is more.
---
But, if noise reduces the number of superposed states to a small finite number: then quantum is "only" a constant multiplier increase in efficiency.
I.e. in the presence of noise, quantum is not a big-O increase in computational efficiency.
This is so obvious that I am sure there must be a flaw in my reasoning.
Disclaimer
The content of this blog is my personal opinion only. Although I am an employee - currently of Nvidia, in the past of other companies such as Iagination Technologies, MIPS, Intellectual Ventures, Intel, AMD, Motorola, and Gould - I reveal this only so that the reader may account for any possible bias I may have towards my employer's products. The statements I make here in no way represent my employer's position, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of my employer. In fact, this posting may not even represent my personal opinion, since occasionally I play devil's advocate.
See http://docs.google.com/View?id=dcxddbtr_23cg5thdfj for photo credits.
See http://docs.google.com/View?id=dcxddbtr_23cg5thdfj for photo credits.
Saturday, December 06, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)